I added my times in the doodle, I’ll love to reach out. Thanks Robby
According to doodle:
Application WG first meeting on Feb 19th at 20:30 UTC
http://arewemeetingyet.com/Caracas/2016-02-19/16:00/Application-WG
@thephoenixbird Thanks, I answered the questions. I wonder also can attend the meetings and which channels?
Ideally we want to use the Reps Vidyo Room, but i have yet to confirm that it is avaliable at Fridays (It is highly unlikely that someone is going to be there on Friday Night )
Hello everyone! Im very very very sorry for not been able to join today in the meeting, i had a power blackout in my zone for almost 5 hours, in the next hours I will reschedule our meeting and lets move forward
I was not able to be about for the scheduled meeting time either (public transport failure in my case). So a second attempt at a meeting suits me
I am going monitoring, thx.
2nd attempt for meeting
Here is the new doodle guys @mkohler @setiawan @anivar @shahidfarooqui @rtsayles @geraldobarros @Spike1 @umeshagarwal , we need to meet ASAP, so please fill this one in the next 48 hours so we can have our meeting: http://doodle.com/poll/43k85a9ftwshum4y
Doodle closes at Monday noon UTC
Hi Arturo and Umesh
Yes please, I am interested to help you in application process, selection
criteria.
Please let me know when you plan to have next meeting.
Thanks & Regards
Shahid
Hello everyone! @mkohler @setiawan @anivar @shahidfarooqui @rtsayles @geraldobarros @Spike1 @umeshagarwal
The chosen date according to the doodle is next Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 12:30 UTC
http://arewemeetingyet.com/Caracas/2016-02-23/20:00/Application-WG
That should be my local time (Caracas / 2016-02-23 / 20:00 ), I think that Doodle auto-converts it to your timezone.
Let me know if there is a mistake.
I am afraid that I am lost now as to when the rescheduled meeting will be.
.
Is it at 20:00UTC - which is in about 3-1/2 hours from now? Or some
other time/day/reality
Erm. Looking above I can see that it is 12:30UTC on Wednesday - please ignore me
We are starting in 5 minutes.
Join the Remo Vidyo room https://v.mozilla.com/flex.html?roomdirect.html&key=RWa4tTy27FSM
@thephoenixbird I’m experiencing an power outage. I will not be able to attend. Catch you on the next one
Meeting Notes - 2016, February 23, 12:30 - 01:30 UTC
Attendees:
- Arturo
- Geraldo Barros
- Lourdes Castillo
- Richard Armuelles
Agenda and Notes:
- Introduction - why are you interested in this working group?
- I want to improve the Reps application process
- Make it easier to understand for new applicants
- Identify people with skills that could benefit the program.
- Goals of this working group
- Get Reps organized in groups related to their specialization/interests
- Reps aligned with mentors on their field of expertize
- Reps working directly with functional areas of their expertize
- Grow specialized Reps for different areas
- Have we missed any goals?
- Have we missed important questions?
- Let’s identify major milestones
- Identify which are the major groups that can be created for Reps
- ??? Resources Management
- ??? Mentoring
- ??? Learning
- ??? Development
- Elabore a plan to update Mentors and align them with the new groups
- Investigate if a Mentor shuffle would be necessary to align mentors with reps of the same specialization group
- Could improve the individual Rep development on their area of interest if his Mentor is knowledgeable in such area.
- Design a new criteria based on a community curriculum
- Vouching in bug should be improved
- Reps should select their Specialization group at their application and Mentor should be assigned accordingly
- Define responsibilities for each specialization group
- Does each groups has a different kind of responsibility? one more than another?
- Identify which are the major groups that can be created for Reps
- Let’s define a timeline for the major milestones
- TBD
- Immediate next steps
- [end of this week, Arturo] Organize a meeting in a more flexible timezone to increase participation 18:00 - 19:00 UTC
regarding yesterday’s meeting, I have a question, if a model is chosen where each reps are involved in a specific area or areas, that involves the mentor in charge must know this area in order to properly orient. But there is a downside, as there is currently a ratio of 10 reps for each mentor (I guess this may vary) this under the current model of the program. With a change to this new model, there may be cases where there are no mentors for certain tasks in similar time zones, I think it is unsustainable to maintain the process of mentoring for example between reps of America with mentors from Europe and other continents and vice versa.
I feel to perform something like this should be done from the inside out, involving first the current mentors and encouraging experienced reps to mentoring (possibly with a program leading to the reps to prepare for briefly) and then those who have little time within the project as well as new applicants.